The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' What does editor decision started mean nature? //-->>The stakeholders provided their inputs in decision making. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide. It provides important insights for future researchers that aim to engage stakeholders in national-level preventive programs in health. Final decisions on the manuscript are solely at the discretion of the Editor(s). and JavaScript. Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America, 3 Thank you for your question. We received approval from the institutional review board of Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, under Nepal Health Research Council (Reference number: 70/16) for the human subject contacts and obtained written informed consent from the participants before collecting data for research purpose. To obtain Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000. Internet Explorer). gebirgsziege on Wed Jun 27 07:39:58 2012 said: 1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved. Unfortunately, the majority of manuscripts received by publishing houses are immediately rejected. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________, For manuscripts in the life sciences, clinical sciences, behavioural & social sciences and ecology, evolution & environmental sciences, This structured form provides a consistent template intended to support our policies on transparent reporting. [CDATA[> What does it mean? We formed a study team representing stakeholders from each category as investigator or an advisor. . Manuscript Under Consideration Nature Communications, Girl Scout Troop 6000 Cookies 2020, Autumn Band Australia, Clairefontaine Graduates, 869 S Atlantic Ave, Ormond Beach, Fl 32176, Neurological Disorder Treatment At Home, Where Is Keon Alexander From, Leave a Reply Cancel reply. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. To obtain They mentioned that the cafeteria staff receive training on hygiene occasionally but have never received training on healthy eating and healthy cooking. The chief editor is also involved in any recommendations for revision. Or it just means that an editor is evaluating it? We exclude work that does not fall within this scope. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. Or it means that the editor has made up his mind and they gonna discuss it now with other members of the editorial board. The emphasis is on instruments and methods used for scientific research, but we will consider articles with. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. We strive to be open; if our expectations for a revision are unclear, we welcome further discussion by e-mail or phone. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Prospective authors are encouraged to consider whether their work attends appropriately to marginalized scholarship. ]]> Reviewers are given a tight deadline to review the manuscript. Commun. Internet Explorer). Tamrakar D, Shrestha A, Rai A, Karmacharya BM, Malik V, Mattei J, et al. Institutional conflict. In our project, the stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and the findings, similar to the study by Boote J et al [11]. Nu-flow Rice Concentrate, Probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better? In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Check that Nature Methods accepts the content type . This means that we reject many good-quality papers that just dont quite reach our bar, but we often recommend transfers to other journals in the Nature Research family that might be more suitable. The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). mugel2110 6 yr. ago. Once the corresponding author approves these, your article is compiled into an issue of the journal and is published in its final form. It's a good idea for you to . Occasionally, we ask reviewers for further input on technical issues, or we may ask authors for a revision plan prior to making a decision. ku. I believe the first part of the discussion i.e. The status reviewers assigned indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Exclusivity. [CDATA[// >Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - reddit PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. On the Encyclopedia platform, the entry type "Topic Review " has a Definition part that usually starts with "Title is". We do not assess grammar, language and storytelling. ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). and JavaScript. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . Direct transfer to Nature Communications was proposed. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Nat Methods 16, 135 (2019). All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Have they appropriately validated the methods performance? One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. YOU ARE NOW READY TO SUBMIT YOUR MANUSCRIPT Click Submit manuscript and you will be taken to our online submission system, where you can upload the required files and check on the status of your manuscript after submission. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. It is Nature Methods' policy to decline a substantial proportion of manuscripts without peer-review, so that they may be sent elsewhere without delay. What criteria did you use to identify/include the individuals from each stakeholder category after conducting the mapping?. Preprints under consideration. The manuscript was published somewhere else with a higher . Manuscripts should be submitted through our online submission system. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. "Under consideration" in some journals like nature is equivalent to " with the editor" in other journals such as Elsevier and Springer publications. ISSN 1548-7091 (print), Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising, Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. this is editorial consideration. 1 . ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ For manuscripts containing new code that is central to the paper, Authors of research articles that contain newly developed code that is central to the main claims in the paper will need to provide details of the code for peer review evaluation. Lines 379 to 387: It would be useful if the authors could highlight on how they incorporated the views of the stakeholders in each step, probably in a Table format. volume16,page 135 (2019)Cite this article. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". and JavaScript. We aim to educate about and raise awareness of scientific and publishing issues through our Editorials and columns such as the Points of Significance. the second sentence means that you have passed this initial check and that your ms has (or will . In all cases, the corresponding author will receive an email from the journal editor detailing which documents from the list below need to be completed. Manuscripts should be submitted with the understanding that they have neither been published, nor are under consideration for publication elsewhere, in the same form or substantially similar form. Thank you for visiting nature.com. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. In each session, a brief introduction of the study and ethical considerations about maintaining confidentiality of the participants, were explained. Nature Methods has no external editorial board; all decisions are made by the team of in-house, full-time, PhD editors. Thank you, -k. -kaveh-. Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. Workshops: As a reader I will be interested to know the aim of the workshop. Daniel Himmelstein of the University of California, San Francisco, analyzed submission and acceptance dates for all papers indexed in the PubMed database and found that the median time between submission and acceptance has been roughly 100 days for the past 30 years. You will need to log in; if you do not have an account, you will be able to register for one when you submit. This essay considers the options for encoding marginalia using TEI, details practices of existing projects, and then turns to manuscripts written by Archbishop William Sancroft (1617-1693) as test cases. We highlight interesting research published both in our own pages and in other journals with Research Highlights, News & Views, and Technology Features, as well as via social media. [CDATA[// >
